The Discount for Lack of Control (DLOC) vs. The Minority Interest Discount (MID)
The Business Valuation Glossary provides these definitions of two similar terms:
Discount for Lack of Control – an amount or percentage deducted from the pro rata share of value of 100% of an equity interest in a business to reflect the absence of some or all of the powers of control.
Minority Interest Discount – a discount for lack of control applicable to a minority interest, or an ownership interest less than 50% of the voting interest in a business enterprise. Is the Discount for Lack of Control (DLOC) the same as the Minority Interest Discount (MID)?
Based on the definitions provided above, most would probably answer yes. However, after looking at all the aspects of control or lack thereof, there are clearly different levels which warrant the use of different terminology.
The following chart illustrates the various levels of control within a privately held enterprise.
100% Equity Ownership Position
Control Interest with Liquidating Control
51% Operating Control
Two equity holders, each with 50% interest
Minority with largest block of equity interest
Minority with “swing vote” attributes
Minority with “cumulative voting” rights
Pure minority interest – no control features
In most situations, a person owning a 100% would have a greater value for their interest than a person owning 51%. Not due to the fact that they own a larger percentage but that the price per share, or unit, would be higher. This is because they have greater “control” than a person with 51%.
Although a person owning 51% is often perceived as controlling a company, they are at the mercy of the other owners for situation like liquidation or those that require a super majority vote.
Because of this, more than likely someone would be willing to pay more for absolute control or conversely, less for non-absolute control. In this situation, would it be appropriate to call the discount from 100% Control to 51% Control a Minority Interest Discount? Conversely, would it be appropriate to call the discount from the 49% interest to the 5% interest, a Discount for Lack of Control?
In the situations described above, it is clearly logical to use different terminology to reflect the true nature of what is being valued. Therefore, when going from one minority interest to another, it is appropriate to use the term Minority Interest Discount whereas when going from one majority interest to another, it is appropriate to use the term Discount for Lack of Control.
But, when are the above discounts utilized and at what magnitude? Are they taken in every valuation case? The answer will depend on the specifics of the case and the method used to arrive at the valuation result, before discount adjustments.
The three most common methodologies used to value minority interests or controlling interests are:
Computed by comparisons with other minority interest transactions, or control transactions, depending on the type of interest you are valuing.
Determine a control value and stop if valuing a controlling interest or add applicable discounts if valuing a minority interest.
Start with a minority value and stop if valuing a minority interest or add premiums for control if valuing a controlling interest.
The problem in circumstances that require the use of a premium or discount is the magnitude of the discount and subjective nature of the discount. It is because of this that, in the opinion of this valuation analyst, it is most logical to use an approach that will get the closest to your desired result, i.e. if valuing a controlling interest, use a method that determines a control value or if valuing a minority interest, use a method that already determines a minority value.
However, there are obviously situations where a combination of the method and discount are appropriate at arriving at fair market value for the interest being valued, such as going from a straight minority interest to a pure minority interest. It needs to be emphasized that this is not always going to be the case and each approach and company is different.
The preceding information was summarized from Business Valuations: Fundamentals, Techniques & Theory, NACVA.
Are you a Corporate, Estate and Trust, Individual, Limited Liability Company, Not for Profit, Partnership, and S Corporation income tax areas & Looking for WEALTH & TAX PLANNING & PREPARATION SERVICES?
We hope you found this article about “Business Valuation Terms Explained “DLOCK” Vs “MID”?” helpful.
If you have questions or need expert tax or family office advice that’s refreshingly objective (we never sell investments), please contact us or visit our Family office page or our website at www.GROCO.com. Unfortunately, we no longer give advice to other tax professionals gratis.
To receive our free newsletter, contact us here.
Subscribe our YouTube Channel for more updates.
Alan Olsen, is the Host of the American Dreams Show and the Managing Partner of GROCO.com. GROCO is a premier family office and tax advisory firm located in the San Francisco Bay area serving clients all over the world.
Alan L. Olsen, CPA, Wikipedia Bio
GROCO.com is a proud sponsor of The American Dreams Show.
The American Dreams show was the brainchild of Alan Olsen, CPA, MBA. It was originally created to fill a specific need; often inexperienced entrepreneurs lacked basic information about raising capital and how to successfully start a business.
Alan sincerely wanted to respond to the many requests from aspiring entrepreneurs asking for the information and introductions they needed. But he had to find a way to help in which his venture capital clients and friends would not mind.
The American Dreams show became the solution, first as a radio show and now with YouTube videos as well. Always respectful of interview guest’s time, he’s able to give access to individuals information and inspiration previously inaccessible to the first-time entrepreneurs who need it most.
They can listen to venture capitalists and successful business people explain first-hand, how they got to where they are, how to start a company, how to overcome challenges, how they see the future evolving, opportunities, work-life balance and so much more..
American Dreams discusses many topics from some of the world’s most successful individuals about their secrets to life’s success. Topics from guest have included:
Creating purpose in life / Building a foundation for their life / Solving problems / Finding fulfillment through philanthropy and service / Becoming self-reliant / Enhancing effective leadership / Balancing family and work…
MyPaths.com (Also sponsored by GROCO) provides free access to content and world-class entrepreneurs, influencers and thought leaders’ personal success stories. To help you find your path in life to true, sustainable success & happiness. It’s mission statement:
In an increasingly complex and difficult world, we hope to help you find your personal path in life and build a strong foundation by learning how others found success and happiness. True and sustainable success and happiness are different for each one of us but possible, often despite significant challenges.
Our mission at MyPaths.com is to provide resources and firsthand accounts of how others found their paths in life, so you can do the same.